Separation Agreements: Separation Agreements create a “Mutually Acceptable and Durable Agreement! A Separation that leads to divorce should be viewed as a problem-solving process: Think about it as if your house has just burnt down: everyone needs a new place to live, new household items are necessary, many documents have been lost, tensions are high, the kids need to be cared for, and everyone is experiencing emotional trauma. It is important to seek professional help during this time of need and Easterling Law is prepared to help you put the pieces back together.
During the year separation, or even before the parties separate, a Separation Agreement can be finalized. This process can be handled outside of court, or filed with the court if the parties are unable to come to an agreement. This separation will include the following issues if they apply:
- Child custody
- Child support
- Post-separation support
- Equitable distribution of property
- Interim distribution of property
At Easterling Law, we help our clients make “good decisions” rather than “fast decisions” by slowing down and gathering all of the financial documents needed to understand the entire martial estate. It is critical to educate our clients on their financial history and future, while dealing with the emotions that are tied to this.
Significant discussion and negotiation must occur to complete a Separation Agreement. Clients must understand the division of assets and liabilities and any support, maintenance, custody or visitation issues.
There are many factors that the court considers when determining whether or not a spouse is entitled to an award of alimony. Those that have been in long-term marriages, in which a spouse is dependent on the other spouse for their financial stability, should seek alimony. The court shall exercise its discretion in determining the amount, duration, and manner of payment of alimony. The duration of the award may be for a specified or for an indefinite term. In determining the amount, duration, and manner of payment of alimony, the court shall consider all relevant factors, including:
- The marital misconduct of either of the spouses. Nothing herein shall prevent a court from considering incidents of post date-of-separation marital misconduct as corroborating evidence supporting other evidence that marital misconduct occurred during the marriage and prior to date of separation;
- The relative earnings and earning capacities of the spouses;
- The ages and the physical, mental, and emotional conditions of the spouses;
- The amount and sources of earned and unearned income of both spouses, including, but not limited to, earnings, dividends, and benefits such as medical, retirement, insurance, social security, or others;
- The duration of the marriage;
- The contribution by one spouse to the education, training, or increased earning power of the other spouse;
- The extent to which the earning power, expenses, or financial obligations of a spouse will be affected by reason of serving as the custodian of a minor child;
- The standard of living of the spouses established during the marriage;
- The relative education of the spouses and the time necessary to acquire sufficient education or training to enable the spouse seeking alimony to find employment to meet his or her reasonable economic needs;
- The relative assets and liabilities of the spouses and the relative debt service requirements of the spouses, including legal obligations of support;
- The property brought to the marriage by either spouse;
- The contribution of a spouse as homemaker;
- The relative needs of the spouses;
- The federal, State, and local tax ramifications of the alimony award;
- Any other factor relating to the economic circumstances of the parties that the court finds to be just and proper.
- The fact that income received by either party was previously considered by the court in determining the value of a marital or divisible asset in an equitable distribution of the parties’ marital or divisible property. (North Carolina Statutes – Chapter 50 – Sections: 50)
The division of property in a North Carolina divorce can be an incredibly complex process. As an “equitable distribution” state, all assets classified as marital property are subject to a fair split, and ‘equitable’ does not always mean ‘equal.’ The intention is to make the division as fair as possible, but fairness depends on several circumstances.
There are three ways in which Assets and debts in a divorce are classified:
- Marital property: All property and liabilities acquired during the marriage are classified as marital assets. Unless stated otherwise at the time of giving, gifts between spouses are considered marital property too.
- Separate property: This includes all assets or debts acquired during the marriage and any gifts or inheritances bestowed on one spouse by a third party during the marriage. Any property identified as separate is not subject to equitable distribution.
- Divisible property: This comparatively limited category includes property acquired after separation due to acts or accomplishments during the marriage. Examples include commissions or bonuses earned during the marriage but awarded after the spouses separated.
Although the presumption exists that a 50-50 split of marital assets is equitable, North Carolina courts often determine that a more lopsided ratio is equitable in a particular couple’s case. Factors that they take into account include, but are not limited to:
- Each spouse’s income
- Length of the marriage
- Health and age of each spouse
- Any support obligations from a previous marriage
- Any contributions made by one spouse to advance the career or education of the other
- Any retirement benefits or pensions that are not subject to distribution, such as Social Security benefits or military disability payments
- Tax consequences
- And several other factors
It is important to remember that there is no automatic right to equitable distribution of assets when a couple divorces. The rights must be specifically asserted by one or both parties BEFORE the divorce takes place. If a claim is not pending at the time of the divorce, the equitable distribution may NOT be pursued later. If two parties come to their agreement on marital property division, they are legally permitted to avoid a court-ordered distribution. The couple may draw up a separation or property agreement that distributes assets and debts in a manner that they find acceptable.
Separation Agreement Paths
- Two attorneys and a mediator are involved
- Recommended use: moderate to high Conflict –the parties hope to agree to all of the terms of the divorce but may need significant help and guidance from attorneys and a neutral mediator to do so
- Many times the negotiation is played with a high vs. low game that can increase the time and cost of the process
- Effect on Co-parenting: Good mediators help the parties consciously make decisions that will facilitate their ability to co-parent later. Mediation encourages healthy communication between the couple.
- Control: The parties make all of their choices related to the divorce with the advice of counsel an input from the mediator
- In mediation, attorneys advise the parties of what they can get in mediation versus what they may get in court
- Timing: In mediation, some of the time-consuming steps of trial are avoided which streamlines the process.
- Two attorneys, a mental health professional and often a financial neutral are involved
- Recommended use: low and high conflict parties can benefit from this path. The parties and their attorneys sign a contract committing to agree to all the terms of divorce without going to court. The parties receive guidance and support from other neutral professionals. This option is efficient and holistic
- Effect on Co-parenting: The collaborative team helps the parties consciously make decisions that will facility their ability to co-parent later
- Control: The parties make all of their own decisions related to the divorce with the advice of legal counsel and other professionals.
- Timing: The divorce process is streamlined because all discovery is focused, voluntary, and informal
- One attorney, a mental health professional and a financial neutral are involved.
- Recommended use: option is efficient and holistic
- Effect on Co-parenting: The Wevorce team helps the parties consciously make decisions that will facility their ability to co-parent later
- Control: The parties make all of their own decisions related to the divorce without legal advice from an attorney, but with input from all of the professional neutrals
- Timing: An average process takes 90 days.
If the parties cannot come to an agreement outside of court, then one person may file a Complaint with the Court to begin that process. Once the Complaint has been filed, many families revisit the options listed above to attempt to settle the issues of:
- Equitable Distribution of Property
- Post Separation Support
- Child Custody
- Child Support
If the parties are unable to come up with an Agreement or a Consent Order then the issues must be litigated.
Contested, Litigated Trial
- At least two attorneys are involved
- Recommended use: This is only the best option in rare circumstances
- One or both parties cannot make reasonable decisions for themselves
- Effect on Co-parenting: This is an adversarial path and can leave the parties entirely unable to communicate civilly with the other parent
- Control: The Judge makes all of the decisions and imposes them on the parties with an Order
- Timing: The length varies widely, but can take several years. It is almost always slower than other options
Because divorce can contain a strong element of financial risk, it is important to have an experienced family law attorney advocate for you and safeguard your interests.
At Easterling Law, we will work to help you retain the property you are entitled to and that which you may need to build a positive new future for yourself.